According to a New York Times story that ran when the film changed hands, it had become so fragile after years of viewings and copying that the original could no longer be projected for fear of damaging it.
The National Archives had already had physical possession of the film for nearly 20 years; the family had given it to the Archives in for safekeeping. The Zapruder family countered that since it was a one-of-a-kind relic, it should be valued more like a Van Gogh painting. Identifying the blood in the Zapruder film as back spatter signifies a shot from the front of President Kennedy.
Sherry Feister beleives the film is genuine. How you get into a dissociative state when watching a Limo through binoculars is anyones guess. I can fully understand why someone would start from the Zapruder film, as Feister and Alvarex do, and work from it. It is equally frustrating when you will not read the entire content of the argument on my blog.
When it is obvious that your eyes glaze-over when it comes to the technical information on film and special effects cinematography. This is not a hard subject to get your head around. All you have to do is pay attention, as it is explained very well by Zavada, Fielding, and if I may say so myself. It is clear to me that you refuse to come to grips with my counter argument because of your preconceptions and biases. Therefore, I am making my arguments here mainly to the readership of JFKfacts in general.
I will not be deterred from my views by distractions whether technical essays or use of medical jargon. There is evidence that disagrees with my judgement, the Zapruder film is one such piece. The two arguments being a The exact wound location is disputed. Jim Garrison managed to subpoena a copy of the film for the Shaw trial. Time Life fought against it, considering the film their private property. Most bootleg copies at the time were made from the trial copy. Excellent article Mr.
All should read it. It brings in to perspective somewhat the time and place. There were no cell phones or computers for the public. There is no way she would place her white-gloved hand directly on such a bloodied, injured site, and there is no sign in the footage of her white-gloved hand being bloodied as she subsequently places it on the boot of the limousine.
It seems these actions alone discount any rear exit wound. Except for the testimony of Clint Hill and trained medical personnel at Parkland Hospital. The source is Arthur Schlesinger Jr. RFK said that McCone said he had seen the Zapruder film and that the president had been hit by gunfire in two different directions.
Everyone has an opinion on that Film and they are each only just that. We have a fairly vast array of opinions on this forum concerning the film. But who has the knowledge and experience with film to form an educated opinion? On the day of the assassination, he and some of his employees went to Dealey Plaza to get a glimpse of the presidential motorcade.
Knowing his footage might prove valuable in a government investigation, Zapruder developed the frame film and screened it for the Secret Service the following day. That same year, the family donated all copyrights on the film to the Sixth Floor Museum at Dealey Plaza. Clint Hill Self - U. Roy Kellerman Self - U. John F. Samuel A. Kinney Self - U. Paul E. Landis Self - U. Secret Service Agent only in extended frame version as Self - U. Secret Service Agent only in extended frame version uncredited.
Tim McIntyre Self - U. Kenneth P. O'Donnell Self - passenger, in following limousine only in extended frame version as Self - passenger, in following limousine only in extended frame version unconfirmed uncredited. Abraham Zapruder uncredited. More like this. Storyline Edit. Kennedy is shown riding in an open-top car, turning on Elm St.
0コメント